Truth and the Holy Ghost

I want to speak about truth and the Holy Ghost.
Why are there so many denominations, beliefs and churches in the world today? There are a few reasons but four reasons stand out as the biggest. These are: false teachers, lack of God’s truth, compromise and tradition.
We all have access to the same Bible so why do beliefs differ?
The answer is in the Holy Bible

All Christians have access to the truth if we listen. What stops us from listening? If we are proud, arrogant or self centered that is a problem but sometimes we just truly don’t want to hear the truth.

Here is where the Bible shows all Christians have access to the truth, John 16:13
Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come. The Holy Spirit comes upon every true Christian. This does not say the Spirit of truth will force you to hear all truth. Christians will be guided if they allow it. All men have free will and God did not take that away from Christians. Even after we are saved it is our free will that causes our problems. Since we will be guided to all truth then every Christian should have the same beliefs and all Christians should be united in their traditions as well. Dispute this and you dispute God’s word. Here is an example of Christians blocking the Holy Spirit:

Acts: 15: 1-10
1And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren, and said, Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved. Circumcision of course was one of God’s decrees in the Old Testament.
2When therefore Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and disputation with them, they determined that Paul and Barnabas, and certain other of them, should go up to Jerusalem unto the apostles and elders about this question. Paul and Barnabas disagreed with this rule.
3And being brought on their way by the church, they passed through Phenice and Samaria, declaring the conversion of the Gentiles: and they caused great joy unto all the brethren.
4And when they were come to Jerusalem, they were received of the church, and of the apostles and elders, and they declared all things that God had done with them.
5But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, (the Gentiles) and to command them to keep the law of Moses.
The Pharisees here believed in Christ Jesus but also believed that gentiles needed to be circumcised to be saved.
6And the apostles and elders came together for to consider of this matter.
7And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe.
8And God, which knoweth the hearts, bare them witness, giving them the Holy Ghost, even as he did unto us; The gentiles had the Holy Ghost so they were saved. The Holy Ghost does not come upon the unsaved.
9And put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith. Peter is saying the hearts of the gentiles was purified by faith and the gentiles had the Holy Ghost. If God purifies us nothing else need be done. There can be no higher purification so circumcision is not required.

What does all this mean? The Pharisees mentioned here were holding onto a traditional law but they did not hear some of God’s truth. Circumcision was a blood sacrifice and after Jesus shed His blood for all sins that put an end to all sacrifices. These Pharisees had the Holy Spirit but their own minds blocked the Holy Spirit from leading them to the truth. They wanted to hold onto tradition.

Sometimes we think a teaching is a new teaching because we have never heard it before but in reality if it is the truth it is a teaching from the beginning. Sometimes what we consider old teachings only came about in this century.

I want to bring forth a teaching many may not have heard because it is rarely taught. Many believe that if a person claims to be saved they can sin all week long and be forgiven every Sunday. This is not entirely true. Let’s go to Hebrews 10:26-29
26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, No more sacrifice for sins means these sins are not covered, perhaps not forgiven.
27But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
28He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
If you know that a sin is a sin and you commit that sin anyway you need to prepare for judgment and fiery indignation from God.
When you commit a sin that you truthfully know is a sin that is acting as though the sacrifice Jesus made for us was no more than a get out of hell free card. You are trampling on that sacrifice as if it were a doormat! This does not make God happy because you have received the Spirit of truth.

If your mind and heart are truly open to the Holy Spirit once you hear the truth you will know it is the truth. No man “translates” the Bible; the Holy Spirit does that for mankind. The gift of preaching and teaching Bible studies are from God and if these people have truly been called by God they will preach and teach the truth.
It is every Christian’s responsibility to study, keep an open heart and follow the true word from God. If you love God you will not listen to the lies from Satan and mankind but if you block the Holy Sprit from leading you then you will be guilty of denying the truth and God’s word.

I mentioned at the beginning that one reason the Holy Sprit is blocked is because of compromise. When someone that admits he or she is a homosexual and a church allows that person to be a priest or pastor that church has compromised the word of God. The Holy Spirit could not lead that church to that action. If that person is a reformed homosexual and shows they have the Holy Spirit then I do not believe God would have a problem with that. There are thousands of other compromises that occur in churches all over the world and in our personal lives but do not fall into that trap. Never compromise, change, reword, or in any way twist the word of God to suit your feelings or the feelings of this world. Satan already has that job.

May God bless the reader with understanding, love and patience.

The Serpent

Why did God use the serpent as a representation of Satan?
In the mouth of a serpent is poison which causes death of the flesh and in the mouth of Satan we find lies which causes spiritual death. There are serpents that are non- poisonous but these also attack and hold with the mouth.
A serpent has no hands, arms, shoulders, feet or legs. Hands represent work and helping. Arms represent love, comfort and security.
A serpent has none of this and the only way a serpent embraces means death. Jesus however can comfort, protect, love protect and embrace His Children both physically and spiritually.

When reading the Bible think about what the stories mean in the spiritual realm. Jesus often spoke in parables and these stories were told of the flesh world but they were about the spiritual world.

Satan does not care about your flesh body and he is not out to kill your flesh body. Satan desires to confuse your spiritual mind and seduce you away from God. If Satan can use your flesh body as a way to seduce your spiritual mind he will attack your flesh body and mind. Satan cannot destroy your soul but with his lies he can cause you follow him instead of God.

Remember this example so that as you read the Bible you may be able to understand more.

Truth and Pride

Biblical Truth. A Parable. Very Important!

There are two things in this world and in God’s world that are very important to understand and they are Truth and Pride. I know that the situation you will read in this parable is not likely to happen in today’s world but bear with me, it has great relevance to the Bible and the Truth therein.
One truth that is evident in all things is that a person can never know if he has the full truth because it is the truth he has never heard that keeps him blind. In the same manner it is hard for humans to know that they are proud if they are too proud to see the truth about themselves and their pride. Now for the parable:
A man named Joe begins work at a new shop assembling a machine. His foreman instructs him on how to assemble the machine in great detail. Joe works for a couple of years happily assembling the machine and has no idea that what the foreman had told him was wrong.
Now we have no idea why the foreman did this. Perhaps the foreman had been taught wrong in the first place or perhaps he was evil and wanted vengeance on the company, either way what is important is that all these machines were faulty either because a part had been assembled wrong or a part had been left out and this fault had been killing hundreds of people.
A few months later another man named Peter working in the shop noticed the incorrect assemblage and mentioned to Joe how the machine should be assembled properly. Now Joe had been trained by his foreman and had been doing the work for over two years AND had trained others as he had been trained and therefore Joe decided Peter was wrong and never changed how he assembled the machine or taught others about the mistake. One day the faulty machine also took Joe’s life.
In this parable the foreman is a preacher, teacher, neighbor or anyone that tells a story about the Bible. Joe is an ordinary person hearing the Bible story. Peter could be a preacher, teacher, neighbor or even the Holy Spirit that knows the truth and tries to correct Joe. Joe’s pride and his belief in his foreman kept him from recognizing the truth and he kept killing people. Joe did not recognize his pride and refused to hear anything that contradicted what he had been taught. This is a thoroughly dangerous state of mind. It is also how many are misled about the Bible.

Here is the point to this story: How do you know what you have been taught is the full truth of the Bible if you have never heard the full truth? You don’t. How do you recognize if you are proud in some way if your pride is hidden from you because of that pride? You don’t.
What is the solution? First, never be so bold (or proud) as to keep a closed mind to new teachings. Once you open your mind and heart you have taken the first step in defeating your pride. This will also be the first step in hearing the truth. How do we recognize the truth? As your pride leaves you and you begin to open your heart and mind to the Holy Spirit that is who will guide you to all truth. This is not always a quick thing and in fact hidden pride is hard to destroy simply because it is hidden from us because of our pride and free will. Another thing that will help is common sense. God gave it to us so use it instead of relying on what you hear from man, and I include myself in that statement.
God gave us all free will and that free will combined with the very tiniest amount of pride will keep us from listening to the Holy Spirit and therefore we will not allow ourselves to be blessed with the truth. In today’s world there are many teachings of the Bible that are either twisted (which is to say assembled wrong) or have left something out. Any of these can cause our spiritual death. It is God’s Will we need to follow, not our own.
The first test for you will be from the first chapter and verses from the Bible. Find out for yourselves if there is pride in you or if you are listening to the Holy Spirit guiding you. Open your eyes, ears, hearts and minds for a truth you have probably never heard. Let’s start a new adventure in God’s word.

The Old Earth

The Truth of The REAL Beginning

Only for those that truly seek God’s Truth.

Scripture is in Red, Comments are in black.

Many things took place in eternity past before the earth, as we know it, was formed. A lot of these activities are not talked about in the Bible and many that are mentioned have been misread, misunderstood or corrupted by mankind or Satan.

We know God is eternity past, present and future. What is left out of the Bible about eternity past? For one thing, the Bible does not relate a time frame as to when the angels and other heavenly beings were created. Also, I have not yet found a time reference when Satan and one third of the angels rebelled and were cast out of heaven, nor how long it was between their creation and this event.

Why are there gaps in the Bible? There are many reasons but I think the most important one is brevity. If everything were included in the Bible no man could possibly get past the first chapter, as it is no man can read and discern the entire meaning of the Bible in a lifetime. Another reason is the Bible was written for the salvation of man. This is the primary importance of the Bible. To put it in very brief terms if something in the past (heavenly or earthly) does not concern the salvation of man or Jesus in which case God left it out. For example: If you recall (or search it out), between the time of the death of Joseph and the coming of Moses there is about a four hundred year gap when nothing is mentioned about the Children of Israel during their captivity by the Egyptians. This is because any activity during this time was not relevant to Christ or the salvation of mankind. God did not include it because it was irrelevant to His Plan.

Food for thought: that is why the great pyramids and many other great historical findings and events are not mentioned in the Bible; they are not important to God’s plan. However there are hundreds of historical and scientific findings that ARE mentioned in the Bible, but that is another study.

This study is intended to shed new light on an old misconception about the creation of the earth. The earth as we know it now is a “reborn or renewed” earth, not the first creation of the earth. Yes Genesis IS about the creation of man and the fauna and flora but not the creation OF the earth itself. The first creation of the earth was totally flooded and destroyed which left nothing alive. If you desire the truth of God’s word please read on and don’t discount this out of hand, you may be amazed. If not you will at least have the opportunity to prove me wrong.

Keep in mind that in Genesis; Satan and his followers has already been cast out of heaven but to where, the earth perhaps? Allow God to guide you to the truth. Do not allow your own prejudices and traditions that were taught to you blind you to God’s truth. Let’s begin.

Genesis 1

1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

This sounds so simple and uninteresting. Many people never see what is hidden behind these words. In order to learn that which is hidden we need to open our eyes and minds to understanding and perception. Having said that let’s continue:

God is eternal, that is eternal past, present and future. The beginning mentioned in Genesis 1:1 is the beginning of the history of man, not God or the universe or even the earth. God does not mention precisely what happened before this world was formed (remember God is eternal past) but He reveals some parts of this mystery in many parts of the Holy Bible and we will get to those in due time. For now we need to discern what is said here and what is left out. For instance; one thing left out is: when in history past did God create the angels, cherubim, and other heavenly beings? This is not stated in Genesis but we know they were created before the book of Genesis begins. Why? Because Satan meets Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden and he is already a fallen angel.

As you may know, the original manuscripts were written without punctuation marks or chapter and verses. The translators put in punctuation marks, verses and chapters. Lets read Genesis verses one and two a bit differently while remembering God is eternal past:

1. In the beginning (at an unknown time in eternity past) God created the heaven and the earth.
Verse 2 says: And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

There are several things a person needs to notice here: The first is to understand that the word “was”: in the original manuscript is the Hebrew word “hayah” which has the definition of: to be, become, come to pass, exist, happen, fall out. This description says nothing about the earth being created this way. This word means became without form and void. The next thing to notice is the word “deep” which in the Hebrew manuscripts is the word “tĕhowm”. According to the Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance this means: deep, depths, deep places, abyss, the deep, sea. So at this time (and because the spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters) we know the earth is completely covered in water meaning it was flooded. This will be reinforced later. The next thing to notice is that the earth is without form and is void. Void here means: emptiness, void, waste. Now we can begin to understand what is said here more clearly. Bear with me on this please.

The next proof of the earth being flooded in Genesis is in: Genesis 1:9

And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so. There was no dry land before this time, all water, ergo, flooded.

At this time the earth is obviously created but is flooded and a wasteland (it is empty) and there is no light (although “darkness upon the face of the deep” could refer to Satan, the prince of darkness).

I have heard some people respond to this by saying this was God beginning His work and it was not yet finished. That has a small bit of logic to it but if this were true, earth would have been completely empty, no water, nothing there ergo, waste. Everything else God does in the next few chapters and verses is a step‑by‑step explanation of what happened and what He created in what sequence. When God creates something like animals, plants and man it is a complete and perfect creation, there are no “steps” involved, also, there would be no reason for God to eliminate the mention of the creation of water; it is a VERY important element even to God as the Bible proves.

Now let’s read Genesis 1:1 as it should have been translated and read and understood:

1 In the beginning (at an unspecified time in eternity past) God created the heaven and the earth, (stop) (and after an unspecified amount of time)) The earth was (became) without form, and void; and darkness was (came to pass or happened) upon the face of the deep. (Stop), (again after an unspecified amount of time) And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. Notice the word “was” also means to fall out. Who had a falling out? Satan rebelled and “fell” from heaven or at least from the grace of God. Some of Satan’s names are: prince of darkness, death, destruction and the desolator. Who do you think may have corrupted the earth and caused it’s original destruction or corruption or desolation? To fall out can also be thought of as an ending as in “the end of the old earth”. There are lots of meanings to that word “hayah”, think about that.

This tells us that God created the Heaven and Earth in perfection but the earth became imperfect or became corrupted. Everything God creates is perfect but many things God created became corrupt (man and Satan for instance). Something caused the earth to become corrupt and I believe God destroyed it with water because of that corruption. I am speaking about a total destruction here, not Noah’s flood, ergo: the “deep” and “void” (nothing on the earth), everything removed. How does man prove he is changed and no longer corrupt? By Baptism in water, ergo being reborn. Where else does the ritual of baptism come from? The earth was baptized by God Himself.

Why do I believe this is a renewal of the earth? Let’s read Genesis 9:1 which takes place after the flood of Noah and compare it to Genesis 1:27-28.

Genesis 9

¹And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.
Now go backwards and look at: Genesis 1:27-28:

²⁷ So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

²⁸And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

Notice the similarities? After the flood of Noah the earth needed to be replenished and it is the exact same wording when God “renewed” the earth after the earth had been so corrupted God had to destroy it in the FIRST TOTAL flood. The only difference being NOTHING survived the first flood and Noah and his family survived the second flood (briefly stated).

I know that is not enough to convince everyone so here is the next proof from:

2 Peter 3:5-7

5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Note that: “They willingly are ignorant of”, in other words they refuse to hear or believe the truth from God’s own word (false or under-educated teachers). By the word of God the heavens were of old (different, not the same as now, changed afterwards, no longer old, reborn) and “the earth standing out of water and in water” speaks of a total global flood. No one is ignorant of Noah’s flood so this is not the flood of Noah. Read on:

6 Whereby (by water) the world that then was (the world, eon or earth age that existed at that time), being overflowed with water (flooded), perished: In the original text perished here is the Greek word “apollymi”. The Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance defines this word as: to destroy, to put out of the way entirely, abolish, put an end to, ruin, render useless, to kill. If it is rendered useless nothing can live there again (unless God renews it) and nothing or no one can use it. This is a pretty serious and final end and the reason God would need to “renew” the earth. “The world that then was”…perished. There could not have been a world that was then if it had not passed away or been destroyed and a new (or renewed) one now exists. To continue:

7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, (no longer the same, new) by the same word (Word of God) are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment (the final judgment) and perdition of ungodly men. Why does this say: “But the heavens and EARTH which are NOW” unless it means there was an old earth or earth age and a new one that now exists and the one now existing is reserved unto fire?

Fire is the testing and purification used by God in many places in the Bible and when we combine this with God’s judgment, this indicates a third earth age coming when the earth will be cleansed again, this time by fire and for eternity. Remember three is the number of completion and this will be the third and final earth age.

There are thousands of false teachings, traditions from man and historical or theological mistakes and lies that attempt to destroy the truth the Bible teaches. Jesus warned us of those and this is why we need to search out the truth.

Why is this important to everyone on earth? Here is that answer:

We are speaking about something most people cannot comprehend which is choosing eternal life or eternal suffering. These flesh bodies are only vessels to carry the spirit body through this life with the hopes that our flesh and spirit minds wake up and choose to follow God. Most people do not want to admit there is a God because they do not want to have to answer to anyone for their misdeeds. We are no longer children where we can hide our heads under our blankets and the boogey man will go away. Satan and Hell are real. As an adult we all know we have to answer for our crimes and mistakes. On earth our crimes may go undetected and unpunished, but be aware, God KNOWS our sins and our hearts and there will be no escaping the Judge in eternity. For this reason everyone needs to know and understand the ENTIRE truth and reality of God’s Holy Word.

This study took many pages to teach the truth of just the first thirty-nine words of The Holy Bible. Why? Because the traditions of man, the lies of Satan and the resistance to the truth is so ingrained in mankind that sometimes it takes more proof to change a false way of thinking than it should. The devices and lies of Satan and the ignorance and false traditions of man has corrupted and confused and robbed us all of the truth. Relearning the truth is what is difficult. It is for this reason I am writing this: To end the lies of Satan and the misconceptions of man.

Ask yourself this: if the beginning of God’s word has been so corrupted by false teachings and lies how many more teachings are wrong? The truth is there if you search, believe, have true faith and trust and ask God for guidance. The Holy Spirit will guide you to the truth if you are truly saved.

Although I feel I am led by the Holy Spirit in this truth, I am by no means overly intelligent or perfect. So I gladly welcome any insight or questions or comments that may lead me to the perfect truth. My only goal is God’s true word and that should be yours as well.

May God bless everyone with knowledge and understanding.

Evolution True or False Part 2

It is said that religion is blind faith where there is no proof.

The Holy Bible is full of scientific proofs, ergo fact.

Evolution is a theory without a shred of proof, ergo blind faith, ergo a religion.

Now that we have shown that evolution is a religion and not science let’s discover what the evolutionists say:

Charles Darwin wrote: “Firstly, why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain, and this perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theories.” He also wrote: “I was a young man with unformed ideas, I threw out queries, suggestions, wondering all the time over everything, and to my astonishment the ideas took like wildfire, people made a religion out of them.” Why do evolutionist leave this out of anything connected with evolution? Another quote from Charles Darwin: “To suppose that the eye, with all it’s inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree.”

If Darwin himself finally doubted his own theory why should anyone else take it seriously? Now a few words from dedicated evolutionist:

Preston Cloud, Geologist and evolutionist: “ There are so many transitional forms between species that we must often fall back on statistical analysis to separate one form from another”. What?? If the proof cannot be found prove the theory by conjecture? Then he went on to say: “The problem with transitional forms is one that all honest paleontologist have a problem with. The geologic record is incomplete.” In other words no transitional forms have yet to be found.

Dr. Leo Hickey, Yale University, and Evolutionist: “There is no problem finding transitional forms”. And then contradicted himself saying: “Evolution acts in very short bursts, it doesn’t leave many transitional forms behind”.

Commenting on the last quoted scientist: First, what happened to “millions of years of evolution”? Secondly, if the second statement is true then the first cannot be. Is this man educated beyond his intelligence? Once again: this is an excuse for no one being able to find any “missing links” which would prove evolution. How sad for the evolutionist, they cannot find the evidence that does not exist.

Now it is time to hear from other scientists:

Werner Von Braun, Founder of the U.S. Space program and former director of NASA: “The idea of creation is not conceivable without invoking the necessity of design. One cannot be exposed to the law and order of the universe without concluding that there must be design and purpose behind it all. To be forced to believe only one conclusion, that everything in the universe happened by chance, would violate the very objectivity of science itself. What random process could produce the brain of a man or the system of the human eye?”

Robert Jastrow, Astronomer and Geologist: “It is hard to accept the evolution of the human eye as the product of chance; it is even harder to accept the evolution of human intelligence as the product of random disruptions of brain cells in our ancestors.”

You read and judge for yourself. This is by no means a complete documentation of all the arguments for and against evolution but I believe this clearly defines the reality thereof. Is there no validity to any of Darwin’s theories? That depends on your viewpoint. The idea of “the survival of the fittest” is valid in a way but it has nothing to do with natural selection or evolution.

We will create an example just for demonstration purposes: A group of finches are released on an island. Now every animal on earth has genes that vary within the species. Because of this there are variations within a species. Now let’s assume this group of finches include those with genes which predisposes some to grow long bills and others to grow shorter bills. If the food these finches eat are from flowers (just an example) and the flowers on this island are a type that grow long and narrow then the finches that have short bills will die out from lack of food leaving only those finches that have the gene for longer bills. By elimination and genetic replication the results of this is all the finches on this island eventually receiving the gene for longer bills. The birds have changed as a group but they are still finches, not a new species. Please note that this has no bearing on finches that live elsewhere because those from the original location will probably still have both short and long bills depending on mating habits and attractions.

Evolution: true or false? Part 1

To discover if evolution has any validity we need to look at the scientific facts, not scientific fraud or misconception.

The first scientific fact is that no cross-link or “missing link” has ever been found. If animals change from one species to another over billions of years the fossil record would show this because of the gradual change.

The life process that a frog goes through reflects this evolutionary change. Allow me to explain: The first thing we see after a frog hatches is a tadpole larva:

And then following onto the first metamorphosis stage:

Followed by the adult stage:

I know this is not evolution but the fossil record would show something similar to this if a transformation from one species to another actually occurred and with the process taking millions of years the evidence would be abundant but it is not. The entire fossil record shows a sudden appearance of new species, NOT a gradual change from one to another. There have been frauds and mistakes by paleontologists and other scientists, which we will deal with later.

Before we examine evolution any further, we need to take on the question of how life began. Did life begin because of a chemical reaction or by a yet unknown natural occurrence?

Once again we need to deal with facts and not supposition or theories.

Before life could occur protein and nucleic acids would have to exist at the same time, one cannot exist without the other. In order for the simplest protein to appear millions of processes would have had to occur in the exact order and the exact configuration with the exact conditions necessary to be present.

Scientists have noted that neither proteins nor nucleic acids could have arisen without the other so that means life could not have been spontaneous. Committed evolutionists cannot accept any such conclusion as that; therefore, they speculate that RNA may have come first, but then he still has to admit that the precise events giving rise to the RNA world remain unclear. Investigators have proposed many hypotheses, but evidence in favor of each of them is fragmentary at best.

The bottom line is: the chances of a simple protein developing spontaneously is so far fetched it would be akin to a man finding the winning lottery ticket on the sidewalk every week for a thousand years. The simplest living organism is so complex and statistically improbable it is more feasible to expect to find tools such as an axe that has formed in nature. Oh, you say a man would have to develop a tool? Yes and with the complexity of living tissue it takes a Creator to make a man. Tools need a creator and tools are simple iron and wood…oops there is the life of a tree that the wood came from, well perhaps a simple metal wrench would form in nature. What? Science has never found any such thing? How amazing is that, just like the “missing links” that have never been found in the fossil record.

Did aliens from another world “seed” the earth with the beginnings of life? If so where did alien life spring from? That brings us back to the same question, which has no answer from the evolution standpoint.

I could go on with more evidence that life was created and not a natural occurrence but for the moment we will assume it is possible for life to occur spontaneously and move back to the evolution question.

What about DNA findings? True scientist have found “even with DNA sequence data, we have no direct access to the processes of evolution, so objective reconstruction of the vanished past can be achieved only by creative imagination.” Since there is no real scientific evidence that evolution is occurring at present or ever occurred in the past, it is reasonable to conclude that evolution is not a fact of science as many claim. In fact, it is not even science at all, but an arbitrary system built upon faith in universal naturalism. Actually, these negative evidences against evolution are, at the same time, strong positive evidences for special creation. They are, in fact, specific predictions based on the creation model of origins. In other words it is more scientific to believe Creation than Evolution. This makes evolutionists preachers of a religion (or a belief system) and not scientists.

Now we will introduce the frauds dealing with fossil evidence.

Ramapithecus was widely recognized as a direct ancestor of humans. It is now established that he was merely an extinct type of orangutan.
Piltdown man was hyped as the missing link in publications for over 40 years. He was a fraud based on a human skullcap and an orangutan's jaw.
Nebraska man was a fraud based on a single tooth of a rare type of pig.
Java man was based on sketchy evidence of a femur, skullcap and three teeth found within a wide area over a one-year period. It turns out the bones were found in an area of human remains, and now the femur is considered human and the skullcap from a large ape.
Neanderthal man was traditionally depicted as a stooped ape-man. It is now accepted that the alleged posture was due to disease and that Neanderthal is just a variation of the human kind.

Human evolution has its currently fashionable specimens that lead from small ape-like creatures to Homo sapiens. These are examples of the most recent alleged links:
Australopithecus aphaeresis, or "Lucy," has been considered a missing link for years. However, studies of the inner ear, skull and bones have shown that she was merely a pygmy chimpanzee that walked a bit more upright than some other apes. She was not on her way to becoming human.
Homo erectus has been found throughout the world. He is smaller than the average human of today, with a proportionately smaller head and brain cavity. However, the brain size is within the range of people today and studies of the middle ear have shown that he was just like current Homo sapiens. Remains are found throughout the world in the same proximity to remains of ordinary humans, suggesting coexistence. We have pigmy’s in today’s world so where is the difference?

Australopithecus africanus and Peking man were presented as ape-men missing links for years, but are now both considered Homo erectus.
Homo habilis is now generally considered to be comprised of pieces of various other types of creatures, such as Australopithecus and Homo erectus, and is not generally viewed as a valid classification.

Human Evolution: The Most Recent Find
In July 2002, anthropologists announced the discovery of a skull in Chad with "an unusual mixture of primitive and humanlike features." The find was dubbed "Toumai" (the name give to children in Chad born close to the dry season) and was immediately hailed as "the earliest member of the human family found so far." By October 2002, a number of scientists went on record to criticize the premature claim declaring that the discovery is merely the fossil of an ape.

Human Evolution: The theory has no support in the fossil record.
Human evolution is a theory in denial. With all of this fossil evidence (or lack thereof) it becomes increasingly clear to an earnest seeker of the truth that human evolution did not happen at all.

There are a lot more frauds that have been exposed but these are enough for now. What worries me is the fact that even with all the evidence proving evolution an incorrect theory and always fraudulent, these same frauds are being taught to children in school as fact even after they have been proven as false. The reason behind this is the idea of “separation of church and state”. Schools are not permitted to teach the truth because if the truth is taught then schools would have to teach that there is a Creator, which some people believe is a religion. Is not religion simply a belief system that cannot be scientifically proven because it depends on a faith that is not scientifically supported? If this is a true statement, then evolution is much worse than any religion because evolution is not only based on faith but on fraud, supposition and a willingness to fake proof to prove the lie. That is why the Christianity is easier to believe than evolution because Christianity is backed by proofs.

In the Christian religion there is historical, archeological and scientific proof of accuracy of the Bible. Nothing in the evolution theory has any proof AT ALL. Since the Holy Bible has been proven scientifically accurate, why not take the rest of the Bible on faith rather than take on faith that which has been proven to be fraudulent? This is only common sense and that is severely lacking in today’s world.

One last word: Not one real scientist of any real merit, credit, accomplishment or noteworthiness has EVER jumped on the evolution bandwagon.

Evolution: True or False?

To discover if evolution has any validity we need to look at the scientific facts, not scientific fraud or misconception.

The first scientific fact is that no cross-link or “missing link” has ever been found. If animals change from one species to another over billions of years the fossil record would show this because of the gradual change.

The life process that a frog goes through reflects this evolutionary change. Allow me to explain: The first thing we see after a frog hatches is a tadpole larva:

And then following onto the first metamorphosis stage:

Followed by the adult stage:

I know this is not evolution but the fossil record would show something similar to this if a transformation from one species to another actually occurred and with the process taking millions of years the evidence would be abundant but it is not. The entire fossil record shows a sudden appearance of new species, NOT a gradual change from one to another. There have been frauds and mistakes by paleontologists and other scientists, which we will deal with later.

Before we examine evolution any further, we need to take on the question of how life began. Did life begin because of a chemical reaction or by a yet unknown natural occurrence?

Once again we need to deal with facts and not supposition or theories.

Before life could occur protein and nucleic acids would have to exist at the same time, one cannot exist without the other. In order for the simplest protein to appear millions of processes would have had to occur in the exact order and the exact configuration with the exact conditions necessary to be present.

Scientists have noted that neither proteins nor nucleic acids could have arisen without the other so that means life could not have been spontaneous. Committed evolutionists cannot accept any such conclusion as that; therefore, they speculate that RNA may have come first, but then he still has to admit that the precise events giving rise to the RNA world remain unclear. Investigators have proposed many hypotheses, but evidence in favor of each of them is fragmentary at best.

The bottom line is: the chances of a simple protein developing spontaneously is so far fetched it would be akin to a man finding the winning lottery ticket on the sidewalk every week for a thousand years. The simplest living organism is so complex and statistically improbable it is more feasible to expect to find tools such as an axe that has formed in nature. Oh, you say a man would have to develop a tool? Yes and with the complexity of living tissue it takes a Creator to make a man. Tools need a creator and tools are simple iron and wood…oops there is the life of a tree that the wood came from, well perhaps a simple metal wrench would form in nature. What? Science has never found any such thing? How amazing is that, just like the “missing links” that have never been found in the fossil record.

Did aliens from another world “seed” the earth with the beginnings of life? If so where did alien life spring from? That brings us back to the same question, which has no answer from the evolution standpoint.

I could go on with more evidence that life was created and not a natural occurrence but for the moment we will assume it is possible for life to occur spontaneously and move back to the evolution question.

What about DNA findings? True scientist have found “even with DNA sequence data, we have no direct access to the processes of evolution, so objective reconstruction of the vanished past can be achieved only by creative imagination.” Since there is no real scientific evidence that evolution is occurring at present or ever occurred in the past, it is reasonable to conclude that evolution is not a fact of science as many claim. In fact, it is not even science at all, but an arbitrary system built upon faith in universal naturalism. Actually, these negative evidences against evolution are, at the same time, strong positive evidences for special creation. They are, in fact, specific predictions based on the creation model of origins. In other words it is more scientific to believe Creation than Evolution. This makes evolutionists preachers of a religion (or a belief system) and not scientists.

Now we will introduce the frauds dealing with fossil evidence.

Ramapithecus was widely recognized as a direct ancestor of humans. It is now established that he was merely an extinct type of orangutan.
Piltdown man was hyped as the missing link in publications for over 40 years. He was a fraud based on a human skullcap and an orangutan's jaw.
Nebraska man was a fraud based on a single tooth of a rare type of pig.
Java man was based on sketchy evidence of a femur, skullcap and three teeth found within a wide area over a one-year period. It turns out the bones were found in an area of human remains, and now the femur is considered human and the skullcap from a large ape.
Neanderthal man was traditionally depicted as a stooped ape-man. It is now accepted that the alleged posture was due to disease and that Neanderthal is just a variation of the human kind.

Human evolution has its currently fashionable specimens that lead from small ape-like creatures to Homo sapiens. These are examples of the most recent alleged links:
Australopithecus aphaeresis, or "Lucy," has been considered a missing link for years. However, studies of the inner ear, skull and bones have shown that she was merely a pygmy chimpanzee that walked a bit more upright than some other apes. She was not on her way to becoming human.
Homo erectus has been found throughout the world. He is smaller than the average human of today, with a proportionately smaller head and brain cavity. However, the brain size is within the range of people today and studies of the middle ear have shown that he was just like current Homo sapiens. Remains are found throughout the world in the same proximity to remains of ordinary humans, suggesting coexistence. We have pigmy’s in today’s world so where is the difference?

Australopithecus africanus and Peking man were presented as ape-men missing links for years, but are now both considered Homo erectus.
Homo habilis is now generally considered to be comprised of pieces of various other types of creatures, such as Australopithecus and Homo erectus, and is not generally viewed as a valid classification.

Human Evolution: The Most Recent Find
In July 2002, anthropologists announced the discovery of a skull in Chad with "an unusual mixture of primitive and humanlike features." The find was dubbed "Toumai" (the name give to children in Chad born close to the dry season) and was immediately hailed as "the earliest member of the human family found so far." By October 2002, a number of scientists went on record to criticize the premature claim declaring that the discovery is merely the fossil of an ape.

Human Evolution: The theory has no support in the fossil record.
Human evolution is a theory in denial. With all of this fossil evidence (or lack thereof) it becomes increasingly clear to an earnest seeker of the truth that human evolution did not happen at all.

There are a lot more frauds that have been exposed but these are enough for now. What worries me is the fact that even with all the evidence proving evolution an incorrect theory and always fraudulent, these same frauds are being taught to children in school as fact even after they have been proven as false. The reason behind this is the idea of “separation of church and state”. Schools are not permitted to teach the truth because if the truth is taught then schools would have to teach that there is a Creator, which some people believe is a religion. Is not religion simply a belief system that cannot be scientifically proven because it depends on a faith that is not scientifically supported? If this is a true statement, then evolution is much worse than any religion because evolution is not only based on faith but on fraud, supposition and a willingness to fake proof to prove the lie. That is why the Christianity is easier to believe than evolution because Christianity is backed by proofs.

In the Christian religion there is historical, archeological and scientific proof of accuracy of the Bible. Nothing in the evolution theory has any proof AT ALL. Since the Holy Bible has been proven scientifically accurate, why not take the rest of the Bible on faith rather than take on faith that which has been proven to be fraudulent? This is only common sense and that is severely lacking in today’s world.

One last word: Not one real scientist of any real merit, credit, accomplishment or noteworthiness has EVER jumped on the evolution bandwagon.